Drawing for BLOOM FRESH

USPTO serial 79406588

BLOOM FRESH

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 762
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
TAYLOR, DAVID T
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 101

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BLOOM FRESH?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Stacey R. Halpern

Stacey R. Halpern Knobbe, Martens, Olson & Bear, LLP2040 Main Street, 14th FloorKnobbe, Martens, Olson & Bear, LLPIrvine, CA 92614

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
031Live plants, namely, grape vines, live cherry trees; live plant material, namely, live grape vine material, live cherry tree material; live vine plants; seedlings; plant seeds; live trees; live plantsACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 16, 2026EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Jul 31, 2026DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE
Jul 17, 2026AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL
Mar 26, 2026OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Mar 16, 2026ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Mar 9, 2026DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED
Mar 9, 2026OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Mar 9, 2026ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED
Mar 9, 2026ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED
Mar 9, 2026EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
Mar 9, 2026JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
Mar 9, 2026EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB
Mar 9, 2026OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Sep 8, 2025GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED
Sep 8, 2025GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 8, 2025CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 17, 2025TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jul 17, 2025CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jul 17, 2025TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 9, 2025RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Jan 17, 2025RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Jan 17, 2025RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Dec 21, 2024RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Dec 20, 2024CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 18, 2024DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Oct 21, 2024MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED
Oct 21, 2024NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Oct 10, 2024REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance