USPTO serial 79406745
KIDDICARE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CORNWELL, ANDREA B
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with KIDDICARE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Absorbent nappies of cellulose for babies; absorbent nappies of paper for babies; disposable nappies made of cellulose for babies; disposable nappies made of cellulose for infants; disposable nappies made of paper for babies; disposable nappies made of paper for infants; nappies of cellulose for babies; nappies of paper for babies; paper nappies for babies; paper nappies for infants; nappies (other than for incontinents); babies' nappy-pants (diaper-pants) of paper and cellulose (disposable); babies' nappy pants; babies' diaper-pants of paper and cellulose (disposable); babies' diapers of paper and cellulose (disposable); babies' disposable diaper pants of cellulose; babies' disposable diaper pants of paper; babies' napkin-pants (diaper-pants) of paper and cellulose (disposable); babies' napkins (diapers); diapers (babies' napkins). | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 14, 2026 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 14, 2026 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 2, 2026 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 16, 2026 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 16, 2026 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 14, 2025 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 14, 2025 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 12, 2025 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 24, 2025 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 24, 2025 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Feb 14, 2025 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Feb 14, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 6, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 18, 2024 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Oct 18, 2024 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 17, 2024 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |