USPTO serial 79407462
CICERO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 654
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STEINPFAD, SARAH E
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 120
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CICERO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Christopher D. Casavale
Christopher D. Casavale Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough LLP301 South College Street, Suite 2300IP DepartmentCharlotte, NC 28202Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Downloadable computer software using artificial intelligence for machine learning software; downloadable computer software using artificial intelligence for litigation and legal workflows, namely, document summary, case assessment, investigation, e-discovery, chronology generation, data extraction, data analysis, auditing and tracking; downloadable computer software for data management, data analysis, document management and document analysis; downloadable software applications and programs for data management, data analysis, document management and document analysis; electronic apparatus for data processing and data transmitting; computer hardware for use in computer networks and communications networks; downloadable computer programs for litigation and legal workflows, namely, document summary, case assessment, investigation, e-discovery, chronology generation, data extraction, data analysis, auditing and tracking; electronic security apparatus, namely, electronic security token hardware used by an authorised user of a computer system to authenticate user identity; security token hardware for providing computer and mobile device user identity authentication | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Software as a service (Saas) featuring software using artificial intelligence for litigation and legal workflows, namely, document summary, case assessment, investigation, e-discovery, chronology generation, data extraction, data analysis, auditing and tracking; platform as a service (PaaS) featuring computer software platforms for litigation and legal workflows, namely, document summary, case assessment, investigation, e-discovery, chronology generation, data extraction, data analysis, auditing and tracking; artificial intelligence technology consultancy; artificial intelligence technology consulting services and artificial intelligence technology design services, provided on an outsourcing basis; design and development of computer hardware and software, namely, design and development of computer hardware and software using artificial intelligence; information technology hardware design, development and engineering services; providing temporary use of on-line web-based software and software applications for litigation and legal workflows, namely, document summary, case assessment, investigation, e-discovery, chronology generation, data extraction, data analysis, auditing and tracking; data encryption services; off-site data backup services; disaster recovery of computer data for communications systems and data communications systems; hosting of software and software platforms for use by others including for data management, document management and network management; providing temporary use of online non-downloadable software for litigation and legal workflows, namely, document summary, case assessment, investigation, e-discovery, chronology generation, data extraction, data analysis, auditing and tracking; monitoring of computer system operation by remote access; remote monitoring of computer systems to detect breakdowns; engineering information, advisory and consultancy services in relation to the aforementioned services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 27, 2026 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| May 3, 2026 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 9, 2026 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 23, 2026 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 23, 2026 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 3, 2025 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 3, 2025 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 3, 2025 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 11, 2025 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 11, 2025 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 11, 2025 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 10, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 10, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 10, 2025 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 15, 2025 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| May 4, 2025 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 12, 2025 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 12, 2025 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Mar 7, 2025 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Mar 6, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 28, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 25, 2024 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Oct 25, 2024 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 24, 2024 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |