Drawing for MICHELANGELO

USPTO serial 79407501

MICHELANGELO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 654
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ROACH, APRIL K
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 115

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MICHELANGELO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

N. Alexander Nolte

N. Alexander Nolte Nolte Lackenbach Siegel111 Brook Street, Suite 101Scarsdale, NY 10583United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
039Travel booking agency services; bus transportation services.ACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 22, 2026RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Apr 9, 2026OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 23, 2026OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Mar 23, 2026OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 20, 2026RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jul 14, 2025GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jul 14, 2025GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jul 14, 2025CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jul 10, 2025TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 10, 2025CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 10, 2025TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 1, 2025RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 15, 2025RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jan 15, 2025RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Dec 20, 2024RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Dec 19, 2024CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 18, 2024DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 24, 2024MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Oct 24, 2024NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 24, 2024REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance