Drawing for REGALTAGS

USPTO serial 79407554

REGALTAGS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 760
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SMITH, BRIDGETT G
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 115

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with REGALTAGS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

MATTHEW J. SMITH

MATTHEW J. SMITH Polsinelli PCPO Box 140310Kansas City, MO 64114-0310United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Electronic tags for goods; radio-frequency identification (RFID) tags; electronic security tags for goods; labels with machine readable codes; labels with integrated RFID chips; magnetic identification labels; machine readable identification labels; bar code labels, encoded; safety nets; protective and safety equipment, namely, lockout systems comprised of valve lockouts, breaker lockouts and cable lockouts in the nature of physical locking devices and electronic padlocks; barrier guards in the nature of warning flags, guards and signs to prevent or stop entry to hatches or into confined spaces, interlocked guards of guards to prevent or stop entry to hatches or into confined spaces; adjustable guards to protect from machinery and equipment hazards in the nature of warning guards and warning signs; tagging systems comprised of electronic tags being a visual warning; drop prevention pads in the nature of floor work mats to prevent small items, namely, small tools and their parts and fitting, bolts, fixings, nails, screws and nuts falling from height through grated floors and handrails; tool tethers, tool attachments, anchor attachments; equipment covers in the nature of covers namely, dust covers and protective covers for pipework to prevent corrosion, blockages and damage and document storage in the nature of wallets for documents; photoluminescent signs; mechanical signs; electronic signs; warning flags; safety markers; mechanical safety signs; lanyards for safety purposes for fall protection; safety apparatus for the prevention of accident or injury in the nature of helmets, safety goggles, radio-frequency identification (RFID) readers; cable identification safety markers for electric cablesACTIVE—
019Non-metallic signs, and information and advertising displays; non-metallic, fixed structures in the nature of hazard warning barriers; non-metallic access chamber covers; manhole coversACTIVE—
020Identification tags, not of metal for the purpose of providing safety and warning information for use in industrial applications; identification tags for animals, not of metal; labels of plastic; non-electric, non-metallic safety locks; printed vinyl signs; magnetic printed vinyl signs; non-metal frames for signboards; display boards; presentation boards; wall-mounted tool racks; non-metallic display stands and signages; signboards of plastics; plastic signboardsACTIVE—
042Design of signs; graphic design; design of artwork; design of new, multimedia signage and product display products; product design and development; design of multimedia signage, and product display services; design of artworkACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 27, 2026TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 27, 2026CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 26, 2026ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Aug 4, 2026GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Aug 4, 2026GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Aug 4, 2026CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
May 7, 2026JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Apr 9, 2026OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 23, 2026OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Mar 23, 2026OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 16, 2026EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Mar 11, 2026LIMNLIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED—
Jan 21, 2026TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 21, 2026CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 20, 2026ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Nov 24, 2025GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Nov 24, 2025GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Nov 24, 2025CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Aug 5, 2025TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 5, 2025CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 5, 2025ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 25, 2025ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Jul 25, 2025EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jul 25, 2025JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jul 25, 2025EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
May 6, 2025GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
May 6, 2025GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 6, 2025CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 26, 2025TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 26, 2025CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 26, 2025TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 28, 2025LIMGLIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB—
Nov 30, 2024RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 12, 2024RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Nov 12, 2024RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Nov 6, 2024RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Nov 5, 2024CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 26, 2024DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 25, 2024MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Oct 25, 2024NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 24, 2024REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance