USPTO serial 79407659
BLAU
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 760
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MCMORROW, RONALD G
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 118
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BLAU?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
WILLIAM J. BRUCKER
WILLIAM J. BRUCKER STETINA GARRED BRUCKER & NEWBOLES75 Enterprise, Suite 250Aliso Viejo, CA 92656United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Radiator caps of metal for cooling radiators of engines; radiator caps of plastic for cooling radiators of engines; mechanical seals in the nature of metal and plastic sealing joints as parts of exhaust systems of diesel engines. | ACTIVE | — |
| 012 | Metal gas caps for land vehicles; plastic gas caps for land vehicles; metal and plastic gas caps for land vehicles; vehicle parts, namely, filler pipes and necks made of metal and plastic being the pipes and necks in which one places a gasoline pump when fueling a vehicle; metal and plastic fuel tanks being parts of vehicles; brake air valves of metal and plastic for land vehicles; non-return gas caps being parts of land vehicles, made of metal and plastic; gas tank flaps being parts of vehicles, made of metal and plastic; dock levelers and ramps for loading vehicles of metal and plastic. | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 14, 2026 | GNS1 | NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Sep 14, 2026 | GNSF | SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Sep 14, 2026 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 1, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 1, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 1, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 9, 2026 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 23, 2026 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 23, 2026 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 5, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 5, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 5, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 4, 2026 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 3, 2026 | LOPE | LETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE REVIEWED - ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Mar 2, 2026 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 2, 2026 | LOPT | LETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE FORWARDED | — |
| Feb 24, 2026 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 21, 2026 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 19, 2025 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Nov 19, 2025 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| May 21, 2025 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| May 21, 2025 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 21, 2025 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 8, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 8, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 8, 2025 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 29, 2025 | LOPR | LETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE REVIEWED-NO FURTHER ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Jan 28, 2025 | LOPT | LETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE FORWARDED | — |
| Nov 30, 2024 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 8, 2024 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 8, 2024 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Nov 2, 2024 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Nov 1, 2024 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 28, 2024 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 27, 2024 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Oct 27, 2024 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 24, 2024 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |