Drawing for AGWA

USPTO serial 79407761

AGWA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 653
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
PEISECKI, MARK A
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 105

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with AGWA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Robyn Lederman

Robyn Lederman Brooks Kushman P.C.150 W. Second Street, Suite 400NRoyal Oak, MI 48067United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Downloadable software using artificial intelligence in the nature of a mobile application for monitoring plants growth in autonomous vegetable device; downloadable software using artificial intelligence in the nature of a mobile application for analyzing vegetables use needs and notifying about the best harvest time; downloadable software using artificial intelligence in the nature of a mobile application for selecting vegetables, herbs and spices for growing in autonomous vegetable devices; all of the foregoing exclusively for use onboard commercial sea vessels.ACTIVE—
011Autonomous hydroponic growing systems operated by artificial intelligence algorithms for growing vegetables, herbs and spices comprised of light emitting diode (LED) plant grow lights, grow cabinets in the nature of closed environments with integrated misting chambers, automated controls therefor, touchscreen monitor, cameras, and humidity, temperature, and water sensors; all of the foregoing exclusively for use onboard commercial sea vessels.ACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 11, 2026GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Aug 11, 2026GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Aug 11, 2026CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jun 25, 2026RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Apr 9, 2026OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 23, 2026OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Mar 23, 2026OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Nov 12, 2025GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Nov 12, 2025GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Nov 12, 2025CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Sep 28, 2025TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 28, 2025CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 28, 2025TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 19, 2025RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 31, 2025RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Mar 31, 2025RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Feb 25, 2025RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Feb 24, 2025CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 13, 2025DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 6, 2024MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Nov 6, 2024NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 31, 2024LIMILIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED—
Oct 24, 2024REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance