Drawing for TRAVELITE

USPTO serial 79407918

TRAVELITE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 654
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
THINGVOLD, CALDER J
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 135

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TRAVELITE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Patrick J. Jennings

Patrick J. Jennings Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman, LLP1200 Seventeenth Street, NWWashington, DC 20036United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
018Bags, small travelling bags; small leather goods; suitcases and wheels for suitcases.ACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 26, 2026RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Aug 17, 2026RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Apr 9, 2026OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 23, 2026OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Mar 23, 2026OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Feb 17, 2026GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Feb 17, 2026GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Feb 17, 2026CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Feb 11, 2026TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 11, 2026CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 11, 2026TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 11, 2026PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Feb 11, 2026PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Jan 28, 2026MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 28, 2026ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 27, 2026DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 26, 2025NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jun 21, 2025RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
May 30, 2025RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
May 30, 2025RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Apr 1, 2025RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Mar 31, 2025CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 20, 2025DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 29, 2024MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Oct 29, 2024NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 24, 2024SDRCSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance