Drawing for HANNIBAL

USPTO serial 79409006

HANNIBAL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 681
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
VO, KOMAL MAKHDOOM
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HANNIBAL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Deborah L. Corpus

Deborah L. Corpus Chrisman Gallo Tochtrop LLC629 Euclid Ave.Suite 1101Cleveland, OH 44114

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Batteries, electric, for vehicles; aerials; remote control apparatus for amplifiers; loudspeakers; coaxial cables; fibre optic cables; cables, electric; contacts, electric; cabinets for loudspeakers; megaphones; diaphragms being acoustics membranes; microphones; headphones; sheaths for electric cables; telecommunications transmitters; transmitters of electronic signals; switches, electric; converters, electric; satellite navigational apparatus, namely, satellite-aided navigation systems; telegraph wires; telephone wires; wires, electric; conductors, electric; copper wire, insulated; electric control panels; voltage surge protectors; horns for loudspeakers; couplings, electric; audio amplifiers; electric ducts; sound recording apparatus for automobiles; sound transmitting apparatus for automobiles; record players for automobiles; sound reproduction apparatus for automobiles; none of the foregoing relating to musical sound recordings.ACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 5, 2026GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 4, 2026NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Oct 21, 2026OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Oct 21, 2026OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Oct 7, 2026CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 7, 2026TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 6, 2026CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 6, 2026ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Oct 6, 2026GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Oct 6, 2026GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 6, 2026CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 23, 2026OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 6, 2026OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Apr 6, 2026OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Sep 5, 2025TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 5, 2025CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 5, 2025TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 26, 2025RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 10, 2025RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Apr 10, 2025RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Mar 5, 2025RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Mar 4, 2025CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 4, 2025DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 8, 2024MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Nov 8, 2024NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 7, 2024REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance