Drawing for BIS

USPTO serial 79409382

BIS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
VIVEROS, KEMBERLY D
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 136

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with BIS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jessica S. Sachs

Jessica S. Sachs Harness, Dickey & Pierce, P.L.C.100 Bloomfield Hills ParkwaySuite 200Bloomfield Hills, MI 48304

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
012Seat belt systems for land vehicles, namely, seat belts, safety belts, presenters, pre-tensioners, retractors, height adjusters, and extendersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 14, 2026MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 14, 2026ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 30, 2026OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 13, 2026OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Apr 13, 2026OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Dec 5, 2025RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 30, 2025CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 28, 2025TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 28, 2025CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 28, 2025TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 11, 2025NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jun 7, 2025RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
May 20, 2025RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
May 20, 2025RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Mar 26, 2025RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Mar 25, 2025CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 24, 2025DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 27, 2024NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Nov 15, 2024MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Nov 15, 2024NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 14, 2024REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance