USPTO serial 79409586
IT GOVERNANCE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- EDWARDS, ALICIA COLLINS
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with IT GOVERNANCE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Business consultancy relating to the administration of information technology; advisory services relating to business risk management; business risk management consultancy; business consultancy services relating to the security of information technology systems; business consultancy services relating to the governance of information technology. | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Provision of training and courses relating to: information technology, IT governance, risk management, business and IT compliance, data protection, information security, computer security, security of systems used in making debit and credit card transactions, information technology auditing; provision of training and courses relating to: business governance, business risk management and business compliance; education and instruction services relating to business governance, business risk management and business compliance. | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Advisory services relating to computer based information systems; professional consultancy relating to computer security; consultancy services relating to computer programming; consultancy services relating to computer software; consultancy services relating to information technology; technical consultancy services relating to information technology; technical consultancy services relating to the security of information technology systems; technical consultancy services in the field of information technology. | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 16, 2026 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 1, 2026 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 1, 2026 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 30, 2026 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 13, 2026 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 13, 2026 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 16, 2025 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 1, 2025 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 5, 2025 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 17, 2024 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 17, 2024 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Dec 4, 2024 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Dec 3, 2024 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 16, 2024 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 15, 2024 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Nov 15, 2024 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 14, 2024 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |