USPTO serial 79409977
THE HASHGRAPH GROUP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 645Office Action
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HOWARD, CHERYL L
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107
What this means
The USPTO has issued an Office Action on this application. A response is typically required before the deadline, or the application can be abandoned.
Need help with THE HASHGRAPH GROUP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Office Action, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robyn S. Lederman
Robyn S. Lederman Attorney of Record, Michigan Bar Member150 W. 2nd St., Suite 400NRoyal Oak, MI 48067United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | downloadable computer software to authenticate and manage transactions using digital assets on the blockchain without use of crypto currency or digital wallets, enable secure and confidential digital currency transactions and trading on tokenized infrastructure, report authenticity, ethical sourcing, and emissions data for purchased digital assets, track and verify carbon offset trades and environmental impact, track supply chain and chain of custody, and ensure compliance with government and industry regulations, all related to transactions on a distributed ledger network; blank digital or analog recording and storage media; mechanisms for coin-operated apparatus, computers and computer peripherals | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Marketing services in the field of decentralized blockchain internet technology; Advertising services; business administration services, organization and management services, namely to promote use of decentralized blockchain internet technology | ACTIVE | — |
| 036 | Financial and monetary affairs, namely capital investment services; Financial services, namely providing secure financial transactions and payment options, and management of digital transaction via distributed ledger networks | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | Telecommunication services, namely electronic data transmission | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Training services in the field of secure and confidential digital transactions via distributed ledger networks | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Scientific and technological services as well as research and design services relating thereto namely software as a service (SaaS) services for hosting software for others for use in distributed ledger platform technology, platform as a service (paas) featuring distributed ledger platform software, and application service provider featuring application programming interface (API) software in the field of distributed ledger platform technology}; design and development of computer hardware and software; research and development services relating to computer hardware and software | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by The Hashgraph Group AG
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named THE HASHGRAPH GROUP
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 9, 2026 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Oct 9, 2026 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 9, 2026 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 7, 2026 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 20, 2026 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 20, 2026 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 8, 2026 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 12, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 12, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 12, 2025 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 12, 2025 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 12, 2025 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 12, 2025 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 4, 2025 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 4, 2025 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 4, 2025 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Nov 4, 2025 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 18, 2025 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 18, 2025 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 19, 2025 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 3, 2025 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 3, 2025 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Feb 28, 2025 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Feb 27, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 21, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 22, 2024 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Nov 22, 2024 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 21, 2024 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |