USPTO serial 79410785
WINTEC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 645Office Action
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MTANOS, CHRISTOPHER GEORGE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 135
What this means
The USPTO has issued an Office Action on this application. A response is typically required before the deadline, or the application can be abandoned.
Need help with WINTEC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Office Action, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Rebeccah Gan
Rebeccah Gan Muncy, Geissler, Olds & Lowe, P.C.125 S. Royal St.Alexandria, VA 22314United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Machines for processing plastics, namely, injection moulding machines and injection-compression moulding machines; machines for plastics working, namely, machines for the foaming of plastic; plastics moulding machines; parts for plastic processing machines, namely, injection moulds, injection-compression moulds, dosing devices, dosing screws, injectors, moulds for casting plastic products and tools; industrial robots, namely, handling devices for plastic processing machines | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 14, 2026 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 8, 2026 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| May 8, 2026 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 8, 2026 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 27, 2026 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 27, 2026 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 13, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 6, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 5, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 5, 2025 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 27, 2025 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 7, 2025 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 7, 2025 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Apr 3, 2025 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Apr 2, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 24, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 29, 2024 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Nov 29, 2024 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 28, 2024 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |