Drawing for GMK

USPTO serial 79411191

GMK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 654
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MANCA, ALBERTO I
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 108

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with GMK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Michael J. Frodsham

Michael J. Frodsham Workman Nydegger60 East South TempleSuite 1000Salt Lake City, UT 84111

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009electrical and mechanical Data processing equipment and accessories, namely, electrical adaptors, switch systems comprised of electrical switches, printed circuit boards (PCBs), microcontrollers, and computer hardware and modules for monitoring and analysis of electric current (electrical and mechanical); peripherals adapted to use with computers and other data processing equipment, namely, computer peripherals; keyboards in the nature of computer keyboards; computer keyboard keycaps; HMI human-machine interface (HMI) operating elements, namely, touch panels, input devices for computers, and electrical controllers controllers; measuring apparatus and instruments, namely, modules for monitoring and analysis of electric currentACTIVE—
040Custom manufacture in relation to the following goods: electronic subsystems in the nature of keyboard controllers, printed circuit boards (PCBs), microcontroller units, webpanels and related input device electronics.ACTIVE—
042Product development; product development consultation; engineering services; quality control and authentication services, namely, user authentication services using multi-factor authentication and single sign-on technology for hardware and software applications; design and development of computer hardware and software.ACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 24, 2026RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jul 14, 2026RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
May 21, 2026OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
May 4, 2026OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
May 4, 2026OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 13, 2026GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jan 13, 2026GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jan 13, 2026CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Dec 23, 2025TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 23, 2025CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 23, 2025ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Nov 30, 2025NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Sep 26, 2025GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Sep 26, 2025GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 26, 2025CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 11, 2025TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 11, 2025CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 11, 2025TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 29, 2025RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 12, 2025RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Mar 12, 2025RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Feb 2, 2025RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Feb 1, 2025CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 31, 2025DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 5, 2024MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Dec 5, 2024NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 5, 2024REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance