Drawing for ORYX

USPTO serial 79411238

ORYX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 654
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HALMEN, KATHERINE E
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 111

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ORYX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Molly Mack Crandall

Molly Mack Crandall Brooks Kushman P.C.150 W. Second St.Suite 400NRoyal Oak, MI 48067-3846

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer networking and data communications equipment, namely, wireless access point (WAP) devices; wireless local area network (LAN) access points for connecting network computer users; network routers; wireless routersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 27, 2026RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jul 7, 2026RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
May 21, 2026OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
May 4, 2026OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
May 4, 2026OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 6, 2026GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jan 6, 2026GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jan 6, 2026CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Dec 3, 2025TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 3, 2025CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 3, 2025TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 12, 2025RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 20, 2025RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jun 20, 2025RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Apr 12, 2025RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Apr 11, 2025CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 9, 2025DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 6, 2024MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Dec 6, 2024NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 5, 2024REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance