USPTO serial 79411667
SALADY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 653
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RUTLAND, BARBARA A
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SALADY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
April L. Besl
April L. Besl Dinsmore & Shohl LLP255 E. Fifth Street, Suite 1900Cincinnati, OH 45202United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | garden salads, prepared; potato salad; dried fruit-based snacks; food products made primarily from fruits, namely, fruit chips, fruit-based food beverage, fruit-based food snacks, fruit-based meal replacement bars; yogurt mainly based on fruits; fruit and vegetable salads; frozen beans; eggs; tofu-based snacks; pre-cut vegetable salads; prepared side dishes consisting primarily of meat, fish, poultry or vegetable; preserved, frozen, dried and cooked fruits and vegetables; pre-cut vegetables for salads; soups; Caesar salad; milk; milk products excluding ice cream, ice milk and frozen yogurt; antipasto salads; legume salads; bean-based snack foods | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 21, 2026 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 21, 2026 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 21, 2026 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 18, 2026 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Jun 17, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 16, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 16, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 21, 2026 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 4, 2026 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| May 4, 2026 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 22, 2026 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 16, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 16, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 16, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 12, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 11, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 11, 2025 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 27, 2025 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 11, 2025 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 11, 2025 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Apr 9, 2025 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Apr 8, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 31, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 3, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jan 3, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 31, 2024 | LIMI | LIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Dec 5, 2024 | SDRC | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB | — |