Drawing for CYBERCAB

USPTO serial 79412082

CYBERCAB

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 774
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
THOMAS-RIGGS, LESLIE A
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CYBERCAB?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

SUSAN BRUSHABER

SUSAN BRUSHABER REINHARDT SAVIC FOLEY LLP5613 S PRINCE STREETLITTLETON, CO 80120UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
012Vehicles, namely, land vehicles; apparatus for locomotion by land, namely, land vehicles, cars, motor cars, hybrid cars; apparatus for locomotion by air, namely, air vehicles for transport ; apparatus for locomotion by sea, namely boats; electric vehicles, namely, electrically powered motor vehicles, low-speed electric land vehiclesACTIVE—
039Transport, namely, land transport, air transport, boat transport; packaging and storage of merchandise for others; organization of travel; providing information with respect to transport; logistics services with respect to transport, namely, storage, transportation and delivery of goods for others by air, or car; delivery of newspapers; water distribution; electricity distribution; distribution, namely, delivery of goods; freight forwarding services; garage rental; rental of garage spaces for parking; vehicle rental; booking of seats for travelACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 28, 2026OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
May 11, 2026OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
May 11, 2026OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 14, 2026ETOPEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED—
Mar 12, 2026RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 24, 2026OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Feb 19, 2026OPNSOPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) SENT TO IB—
Feb 19, 2026OPNCOPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) CREATED—
Feb 11, 2026ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Jan 13, 2026NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jan 13, 2026PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 7, 2026NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Dec 16, 2025CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 16, 2025TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 15, 2025CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 15, 2025TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 2, 2025LOPRLETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE REVIEWED-NO FURTHER ACTION TAKEN—
Dec 2, 2025LOPRLETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE REVIEWED-NO FURTHER ACTION TAKEN—
Sep 26, 2025LOPTLETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE FORWARDED—
Sep 26, 2025LOPTLETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE FORWARDED—
Jul 5, 2025RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 17, 2025RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jun 17, 2025RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Apr 16, 2025RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Apr 15, 2025CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 26, 2025DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 10, 2025ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 10, 2025REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jan 10, 2025CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Jan 10, 2025COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Dec 12, 2024MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Dec 12, 2024NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 12, 2024REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance