Drawing for POW

USPTO serial 79412282

POW

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 649Office Action
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MAHONEY, KATHERINE AILEEN
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 127

What this means

The USPTO has issued an Office Action on this application. A response is typically required before the deadline, or the application can be abandoned.

Need help with POW?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Get help with this Office Action, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Rodney L. Skoglund

Rodney L. Skoglund Renner, Kenner, Greive, Bobak, Taylor &106 S. Main StreetSuite 400Akron, OH 44308-1412

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
031Edible animal and pet treats containing meat and meat flavoring; animal and pet foods containing meat and meat flavoringACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 21, 2026RDX3NOTIFICATION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED—
Sep 21, 2026RDX1ACTION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED E-MAILED—
Sep 21, 2026RRDXACTION REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED COUNTED NOT MAILED—
Jul 13, 2026TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 13, 2026CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 13, 2026ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
May 28, 2026OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
May 11, 2026OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
May 11, 2026OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Apr 13, 2026GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Apr 13, 2026GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 13, 2026CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 12, 2026TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 12, 2026CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 12, 2026TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 29, 2025RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 13, 2025RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Aug 12, 2025RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jun 28, 2025RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jun 27, 2025CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 13, 2025DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 13, 2024MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Dec 13, 2024NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 12, 2024SDRCSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance