Drawing for ERMINE

USPTO serial 79412624

ERMINE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 661
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BIBB, SCOTT
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 109

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ERMINE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Martin R. Geissler

Martin R. Geissler Muncy, Geissler, Olds & Lowe, P.C.125 S. Royal StreetAlexandria, VA 22314United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
012Land vehicles; land vehicles, sea vehicles and aircraft for police, security or military purposes; quad bikes; trikes, namely three-wheeled motor vehicles; off-road vehicles, namely buggy type vehicles; engines for land vehicles; structural parts for land vehicles and for engines for vehicles, included in this class; structural components for vehicles for all of the aforementioned goods; braking systems for vehicles; all the aforementioned goods, in particular for police, security or military purposesACTIVE—
013Weapons, excluding firearms, air guns and gas operated guns; radiation weapons in the nature of directed-energy weapons, especially laser weapons, namely a directed-energy weapon that uses lasers, microwave weapons, namely a directed-energy weapon that uses focused, high-energy radiofrequency waves to damage or disable electronic systems, and sonic weapons, namely non-lethal acoustic devices that use focused sound waves to incapacitate, disorient, or harm individuals; ammunition; explosives; fireworks; projectiles; shells being projectiles; mortars being firearms; infrared defense rocket warheads; guns; cannons; rockets; guided missiles; tanks being weapons; explosives, namely explosive charges for projectiles; explosive charges for weapons; anti-aircraft weapons, namely anti-aircraft guns, surface to air missiles, and drones and anti-aircraft systems comprised of anti-aircraft guns, surface to air missiles, and drones; explosive devices for minefield breaching and minefield clearance; firearm sights, excluding telescopic sights; explosive devices for generating acoustic or optical signals; military decoys being explosive flares for generating electromagnetic, acoustic, optical and thermal decoys; structural parts for all the aforesaid goodsACTIVE—
028Model toy vehicles; toy model kit cars; toy model kits for vehicles, namely aircraft, automobiles, ships, military equipment and toy models assembled therefrom; building components intended for toy and model-making purposes, namely scale model kits, toy construction sets and toy construction sets containing such building elements for the reproduction of land, water and air vehicles; finished toy models in the form of small-scall replicas of vehicles, in particular finished models made of plastic or metal; all the aforementioned goods, in particular those relating to police, security technology, or militaryACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 23, 2026OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 6, 2026OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jul 5, 2026OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Oct 2, 2025TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 2, 2025CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 2, 2025TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 18, 2025CORNCORRECTION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED—
Apr 19, 2025RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 2, 2025RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Apr 2, 2025RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Feb 27, 2025RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Feb 26, 2025CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 25, 2025DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 8, 2025CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB—
Dec 30, 2024MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Dec 30, 2024NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 19, 2024REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance