Drawing for MAXPRESSO

USPTO serial 79413353

MAXPRESSO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MONINGHOFF, KIM TERESA
Law office
TTAB

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with MAXPRESSO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

REBECCA L. WILSON

REBECCA L. WILSON THE DOBRUSIN LAW FIRM, P.C.29 WEST LAWRENCE STREETSUITE 210PONTIAC, MI 48342

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005Nutritional supplements; protein dietary supplements; nutritional supplements containing whey protein; food supplements containing proteins and featuring coffee flavouring; whey protein food supplements containing coffee flavouringABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 3, 2026MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION—
Aug 3, 2026ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Aug 3, 2026OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Aug 3, 2026OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
Jun 11, 2026OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
May 25, 2026OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
May 25, 2026OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Apr 23, 2026RFNPREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 31, 2026ETOPEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED—
Mar 31, 2026OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Mar 23, 2026OPNSOPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) SENT TO IB—
Mar 21, 2026OPNCOPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) CREATED—
Feb 18, 2026ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Jan 20, 2026NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jan 20, 2026PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 18, 2026DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 14, 2026NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Dec 26, 2025CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 23, 2025TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 23, 2025CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 23, 2025TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 12, 2025RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 23, 2025RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jun 23, 2025RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Apr 25, 2025RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Apr 24, 2025CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 24, 2025DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 3, 2025MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jan 3, 2025NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 30, 2024LIMILIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED—
Dec 26, 2024REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance