Drawing for OMNIGRID

USPTO serial 79414725

OMNIGRID

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 774
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BLAZICH, JOAN MICHELE
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with OMNIGRID?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

REBECCAH GAN

REBECCAH GAN MUNCY, GEISSLER, OLDS & LOWE, P.C.125 S. ROYAL ST.ALEXANDRIA, VA 22314UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Machine tools for machining workpieces; cutting, drilling, abrading, sharpening and surface treatment machines; separating machines being vacuum cleaners for industrial purposes; saw machines; machines for concrete processing; machines for cutting and polishing metal; structural parts, fittings and accessories relating to the aforesaid goods; none of the foregoing for use in connection with food processing or food packaging machinesACTIVE—
009Downloadable software for controlling machine tools for processing workpieces, separating machines, saw machines, machines for concrete processing, machines for metalworking, cutting, drilling, grinding, sharpening and surface treatment machines and apparatus; controlling and regulating systems comprised of downloadable operating software for machine tools for processing workpieces, separating machines, saw machines, machines for concrete processing, machines for metalworking, cutting, drilling, grinding, sharpening and surface treatment machines and apparatus; none of the foregoing for use in connection with food processing or food packaging machinesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 24, 2026RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 2, 2026ETOPEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED—
Sep 2, 2026OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Aug 31, 2026OPNSOPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) SENT TO IB—
Aug 29, 2026OPNCOPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) CREATED—
Jul 2, 2026OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 15, 2026OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jun 15, 2026OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 30, 2026ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Mar 3, 2026NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Mar 3, 2026PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 25, 2026NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Feb 5, 2026CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 14, 2026TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 13, 2026CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 13, 2026TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 1, 2025RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 14, 2025RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jul 14, 2025RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
May 22, 2025RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
May 21, 2025CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 19, 2025DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 16, 2025MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jan 16, 2025NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jan 16, 2025REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance