Drawing for MEDRAYSINTELL

USPTO serial 79415603

MEDRAYSINTELL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 661
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
AVENT, TEAGUE A
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 126

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MEDRAYSINTELL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Cathleen E. Stadecker

Cathleen E. Stadecker Downs Rachlin Martin PLLC199 Main Street, PO Box 190Burlington, VT 05402United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Scientific monitoring services in the field of nuclear medicine and nuclear engineering for scientific research purposes and economic intelligence purposes; Preparing and drafting scientific reports in the nature of scientific research services in the field of nuclear medicine and nuclear engineering; Scientific advice on nuclear engineeringACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 16, 2026OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 29, 2026OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jun 29, 2026OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 21, 2026TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 21, 2026CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 21, 2026TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 8, 2025RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 22, 2025RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jul 22, 2025RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
May 28, 2025RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
May 27, 2025CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 23, 2025DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 28, 2025NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Mar 6, 2025NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Feb 2, 2025MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Feb 2, 2025NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jan 30, 2025REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance