USPTO serial 79416281
NAWAH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 645Office Action
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BLAKESLEE, RICHARD A
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 123
What this means
The USPTO has issued an Office Action on this application. A response is typically required before the deadline, or the application can be abandoned.
Need help with NAWAH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Office Action, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
G MATHW LOMBARD
G MATHW LOMBARD LOMBARD & GELIEBTER LLC1234 FARMINGTON AVESTE 1334WEST HARTFORD, CT 06017Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Unprocessed composite carbon epoxy resins containing carbon nanotubes for industrial use, namely, vertically aligned carbon nanotube mats; Carbon composite materials consisting of a fibrous reinforcing structure made of carbon fibers and densified by a carbon matrix, for use in manufacturing, namely, nanostructured composite materials; polymer alloy compositions used for molding; nanotube polymeric membranes in chemical form for the separation of gas; nanoporous waterproofing membranes in liquid chemical form for use in construction | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | Anodes; cathodes; electric cables; accumulators; electric resistances, electric capacitors; electric conductors; electrolyzers; chromatography apparatus for laboratory use; electric batteries; optical inspection apparatus and instruments; lasers; optical lenses; photovoltaic cells; electric accumulators | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Research and development in the field of biotechnology, namely, nanostructures, nanomaterials and electric accumulator devices; technical studies and analyses in the field of biotechnology, namely, nanostructures, nanomaterials and electric accumulator devices; design and development of new products for third parties in the field of biotechnology, namely, nanostructures, nanomaterials and electric accumulator devices; biotechnology research, namely, technical project studies in the field of biotechnology, namely, nanostructures, nanomaterials and electric accumulator devices; biotechnology research, namely, testing of materials and products in the field of nanostructures, nanomaterials and electric accumulator devices | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 23, 2026 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 14, 2026 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jul 14, 2026 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 14, 2026 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 6, 2026 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 5, 2026 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 16, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 16, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 16, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 16, 2026 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 16, 2026 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jun 16, 2026 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| May 12, 2026 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 12, 2026 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 9, 2026 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Dec 25, 2025 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 15, 2025 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 28, 2025 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 28, 2025 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Sep 10, 2025 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Sep 9, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 8, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 7, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Sep 7, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 6, 2025 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |