USPTO serial 79416576
SAMYANG
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 645Office Action
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MANCA, ALBERTO I
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 108
What this means
The USPTO has issued an Office Action on this application. A response is typically required before the deadline, or the application can be abandoned.
Need help with SAMYANG?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Office Action, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Richard Y. Kim
Richard Y. Kim Snell & Wilmer L.L.P.One East Washington Street, Suite 2700Phoenix, AZ 85004-2556United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Flour mixes; crystallized rock sugar; maltose for food; wheat flour; biscuit mixes; mixes for the preparation of bread; sugar; potato starch for food; manioc starch for food; yuca starch for food; cassava starch for food; konjac starch for food; sweet potato starch for food; rice starch for food; arrowroot starch for food; glucose for food, namely, glucose for culinary purposes; fructose for food; liquid fructose for food; oligosaccharides being natural sweeteners for culinary purposes; glucose for culinary purposes; raw sugar; grain syrup, namely, brown rice syrup for flavoring food and beverages; palm sugar; beverages made of tea; natural sweeteners; coffee; cookie mixes; fructo-oligosaccharide being natural sweeteners for culinary purposes; food products for prevention of hangover consisting primarily of yeast, in the nature of yeast powder, not for medical purposes; food products consisting primarily of yeast in the nature of yeast extracts, yeast for oenological use, and yeast powder, not for medical purposes; food products against hangover consisting primarily of yeast in the nature of yeast extracts, yeast for oenological use, yeast powder, not for medical purposes; cube sugar; treacle; royal jelly for food purposes; natural sweeteners, in particular allulose for culinary purposes; sugar substitutes for culinary purposes | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 22, 2026 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 7, 2026 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 7, 2026 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 28, 2026 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Aug 28, 2026 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 28, 2026 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 28, 2026 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 28, 2026 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 28, 2026 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 28, 2026 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 28, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 28, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 28, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 17, 2025 | CORN | CORRECTION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Aug 23, 2025 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 1, 2025 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 1, 2025 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jun 11, 2025 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jun 10, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 4, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 9, 2025 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Mar 4, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Mar 4, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 3, 2025 | LIMI | LIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Feb 13, 2025 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |