Drawing for KONVO

USPTO serial 79416644

KONVO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 661
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
NUNLEY, CHRISTOPHER MICHAEL
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 104

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with KONVO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mari-Elise Paul

Mari-Elise Paul McBrayer PLLC500 W. Jefferson St., Suite 2400Louisville, KY 40202United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
020Furniture, namely, tables, chairs, file cabinets, desks, lounge chairs, chairs and benches to be used as public seating; office furniture; restaurant furniture, namely chairs, stools, sofas and tables; furniture for use in schools, public spaces, hospitals, public and private care-home institutions and public waiting rooms.ACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 30, 2026OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 13, 2026OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jul 12, 2026OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jul 9, 2026LIMGLIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB—
Feb 12, 2026TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 12, 2026CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 12, 2026TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 29, 2025RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 13, 2025RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Aug 13, 2025RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jul 2, 2025RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jul 1, 2025CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 20, 2025DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 13, 2025MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Feb 13, 2025NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Feb 13, 2025REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance