Drawing for MBRYONICS

USPTO serial 79416772

MBRYONICS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 661
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LEE, RAYMOND KANGMIN
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 127

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MBRYONICS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Monique A. Morneault

Monique A. Morneault Scherrer Patent & Trademark Law, P.C.17 E. Crystal Lake Ave.Crystal Lake, IL 60014United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Optical communications instruments and components, namely, telescopes, optical benches, optical transceivers, and free-space optics transmission systems; intercommunication satellites; satellites; telecommunication satellitesACTIVE—
012Launch vehicles for satellites; space vehicles.ACTIVE—
038Telecommunication services, namely satellite telecommuncation services.ACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 30, 2026OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 13, 2026OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jul 12, 2026OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 14, 2026TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 14, 2026CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 14, 2026TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 18, 2025RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 3, 2025RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Dec 3, 2025RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Oct 22, 2025RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Oct 21, 2025CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 16, 2025DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 14, 2025MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Feb 14, 2025NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Feb 13, 2025REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance