USPTO serial 79417735
HK MARS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 681
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HENRY, NAKIA D
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with HK MARS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Molly Mack Crandall
Molly Mack Crandall Brooks Kushman P.C.150 W. Second St.Suite 400NRoyal Oak, MI 48067-3846Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 008 | Table cutlery, namely, spoons, knives, forks; side arms, other than firearms, namely, swords, hunting knives, throwing knives, knives for hobby use, hand-operated knife to aid in skinning an animal, fixed blade knives, diving knives, folding knives, pocket knives, working knives, sport knives, utility knives, jack knives, drawing knives, fleshing knives, multi-tool knives, sterling silver table knives, pen knives; kitchen knives; knife bags; hand-operated tools and implements, namely, bayonets, fishing and hunting knives, side arms, namely swords, manually operated jacks and stands for hand jacks, pocket knives, sport knives, folding knives, chef's knives, kitchen knives, butcher knives, paring knives, table knives of precious metals and utility knives, cutting tools, screw drivers, shovels, wrenches, hammers, hand-operated pumps, reamers, locking clamp tools, chisels, disarming tools for improvised explosive devices (IED), manually-operated guides for knives and saws, hand jacks, drills, cider presses, broadforks, door openers being hand-operated forcible entry tools, sharpening tools and instruments, riveting tools, manually-operated grindstones, sharpening and grinding wheels, sharpening and grinding wheels, files for smoothing surfaces of metal, lug nut and lug bolt cover removers, abrading tools, pipe flange alignment bolts and pins, hand-operated tools for reaching, grabbing, and handling small objects, hand tools having a blade and hook to assist in skinning an animal, for treatment of materials, and for construction, repair and maintenance | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | Clothing, namely, shirts, polo shirts, t-shirts, pants, sweaters, hooded sweatshirts; footwear; headwear | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 28, 2026 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 6, 2026 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 10, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 10, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 10, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 13, 2026 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 27, 2026 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 26, 2026 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 2, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 2, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 2, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 7, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 7, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 7, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 7, 2025 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 10, 2025 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Oct 7, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 10, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 10, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 10, 2025 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 26, 2025 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 7, 2025 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 7, 2025 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| May 11, 2025 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| May 9, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 30, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 28, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Feb 28, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 27, 2025 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |