USPTO serial 79418274
SAMYANG
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 645Office Action
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MANCA, ALBERTO I
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 108
What this means
The USPTO has issued an Office Action on this application. A response is typically required before the deadline, or the application can be abandoned.
Need help with SAMYANG?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Office Action, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Richard Y. Kim
Richard Y. Kim Snell & Wilmer L.L.P.One East Washington Street, Suite 2700Phoenix, AZ 85004-2556United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Processed food products against hangover in the nature of plant-based milk substitutes, plant-based cheese substitutes, plant-based imitation meat mainly based on pueraria extract, not for medical purposes; processed food products against hangover, namely, licorice plant extracts for use as ingredients of nutritional supplements and vitamins, not for medical purposes; processed food products against hangover in the nature of combined fruit and vegetable purees, fruit and vegetable granules for use in prepared meals, confit in the nature of a cooked fruit and vegetable-based spread mainly based on fruit and vegetable extracts, not for medical purposes; frozen red ginseng for use as a vegetable; processed food products against hangover in the nature of vegetable purees, vegetable granules for use in prepared meals, confit in the nature of a cooked vegetable-based spread mainly based on yam extract, not for medical purposes; fermented processed red ginseng for use as a vegetable; processed food products against hangover in the nature of bean curd, bean dip, bean-based snack foods mainly based on bean sprout extract, not for medical purposes; processed food products in the nature of plant-based milk substitutes, plant-based cheese substitutes, plant-based imitation meat against hangover mainly based on hovenia dulcis extract, not for medical purposes; processed red ginseng products, namely, preserved ginseng for use as a vegetable; red ginseng powders being processed vegetables; red ginseng jeolpyeon being sliced Korean red ginseng for use as a vegetable; red ginseng jelly for food purposes, other than confectionery; processed oils and fats for food; vegetable oils and fats for food; perilla oil being vegetable oil for food; peanut oil for food; corn oil for food; sesame oil for food; soya bean oil for food; sunflower oil for food; olive oil for food; canola oil for food | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 22, 2026 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 7, 2026 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 7, 2026 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 20, 2026 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Aug 20, 2026 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 20, 2026 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 28, 2026 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 28, 2026 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 28, 2026 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 28, 2026 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 28, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 28, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 28, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 28, 2025 | CORN | CORRECTION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Aug 15, 2025 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 29, 2025 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 29, 2025 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jun 8, 2025 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jun 7, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 4, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 9, 2025 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Mar 28, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Mar 28, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 25, 2025 | LIMI | LIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Mar 6, 2025 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |