USPTO serial 79418303
HORTEX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 649Office Action
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- AGREDA, SAMANTHA LEIGH
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 123
What this means
The USPTO has issued an Office Action on this application. A response is typically required before the deadline, or the application can be abandoned.
Need help with HORTEX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Office Action, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Richard J. Gurak
Richard J. Gurak Advitam IP, LLC150 S. Wacker Drive, Suite 2400Chicago, IL 60606United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 032 | Beers; non-carbonated and carbonated drinking water; mineral water; table waters; soft drinks; flavored mineral waters; preparations for making mineral water and flavored mineral water; non-alcoholic beverages, namely, non-carbonated drinking water, carbonated drinking water, mineral water, flavored mineral water, table waters, soft drinks, non-alcoholic honey-based beverages, fruit juices, vegetable juices, mixed fruit-vegetable juices, non-alcoholic cocktails, condensed fruit and vegetable juices, fruit juice also containing fruit puree, low-calorie fruit and vegetable juices, fruit nectars, sorbets as beverages, isotonic beverages, energy drinks, whey beverages, lemonades, smoothies; non-alcoholic honey-based beverages; non-alcoholic beverages, namely, fruit juices; non-alcoholic fruit extracts used in the preparation of beverages; non-alcoholic cocktails; fruit, vegetable and mixed fruit-vegetable juices, beverages and nectars, all being nonalcoholic and not for medical purposes; condensed fruit and vegetable juices; fruit juices and vegetable juices, mixed fruit-vegetable puree juices, namely, mixed fruit-vegetable juices also containing fruit and vegetable purees; low-calorie fruit and vegetable juices, drinks and nectars, all being non-alcoholic and not for medical purposes; fruit, vegetable and mixed fruit-vegetable juices, beverages and nectars enriched with vitamins and/or calcium and/or iron and/or other minerals, all being non-alcoholic and not for medical purposes; sorbets as beverages; isotonic beverages; energy drinks; whey beverages; lemonades, syrups for lemonades; syrups and preparations for the preparation of beverages, namely, for making non-carbonated drinking water, carbonated drinking water, mineral water, flavored mineral water, table waters, soft drinks, nonalcoholic honey-based beverages, fruit juices, vegetable juices, mixed fruit-vegetable juices, non-alcoholic cocktails, condensed fruit and vegetable juices, fruit juice also containing fruit puree, low-calorie fruit and vegetable juices, fruit nectars, sorbets as beverages, isotonic beverages, energy drinks, whey beverages, lemonades, smoothies; non-alcoholic essences for making nonalcoholic beverages, not in the nature of essential oils; non-alcoholic fruit and vegetable extracts used for the preparation of beverages; fruit, vegetable and mixed fruit-vegetable smoothies; smoothies with or without grains, with or without plant extracts, with or without milk products | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 2, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 2, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 2, 2026 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 1, 2026 | GNS1 | NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Sep 1, 2026 | GNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 1, 2026 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 31, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 31, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 31, 2026 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 20, 2026 | ATRV | ATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 8, 2026 | CREV | CORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - ATTORNEY REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| Feb 3, 2026 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Feb 3, 2026 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 3, 2026 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 17, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 17, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 17, 2025 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 12, 2025 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 22, 2025 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 22, 2025 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| May 23, 2025 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Apr 24, 2025 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Apr 23, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 25, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 7, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Mar 7, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 6, 2025 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |