Drawing for CARL STAHL

USPTO serial 79418490

CARL STAHL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 681
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SOUNDAR, SHERYL CHRISTINA
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CARL STAHL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Kumiko Ide

Kumiko Ide Wenderoth, Lind & Ponack, L.L.P.1150 Connecticut Avenue, NW, Suite 505Washington, DC 20036United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
006Chains of metal, namely, lashing chains, chain harnesses and tension chain assemblies for formwork, excluding drive chains for vehicles; hardware from common metals, being chain accessories, in particular suspension heads, hooks, connection pieces with shackles, end links and connecting links, shortening claws, clevis ring, cardan and socket locks, swivel, overload control members, quick-acting closures and tighteners; metal and wire rope harnesses; hardware from common metals, being rope accessories, in particular hooks, shackles, clamps, particularly for tightening, rope thimbles, rings, ring hanger, swirl catcher ball bearing swivel, rope pears and fork sleeves; metal hardware for belts and bands, in particular clamping bracket, ratchet braces, clamp locks, hooks, eyes and crane shackles; shroud tighteners, threaded, fork-type and eye end pieces, turnbuckles, attachment hooks for securing loads, lashing hollows and lashing straps, of metal; lift and beam clamps of metal; load hooks of metal; double eye hooks; transport harnesses and frames made of metal; metal ropes and special-purpose ropes made of wire; straps and belts made of metalACTIVE—
007Tensioning winches with and without suspension gear, made of common metals, in particular out of stainless steel; cranes, not movable by road, in particular overhead travelling cranes, slewing pillar cranes and slewing wall cranes; hoisting gear, namely, lifting magnets, chain blocks, lever hoists; manually controlled and operated cranesACTIVE—
008Hand-operated hoisting gear, in particular clamp tools, grips for pipe hanging tools and claw hammers; manually controlled hoisting gear, consisting of suspension claw hand hooks, levers; hand hooks, namely, C-hooks; lifting forks, hand-operated tools for grabbing barrels and boxes; hand-operated tools for grabbing objects, namely, parallel grippers, belt-type winches and tension winches, except chain hoists; hand-operated lifting platforms; lifting and beam clamps being hand tools; grippers, hand-operatedACTIVE—
022Ropes and special-purpose ropes of natural and artificial fibres; flat rope sling bands being cargo slings of rope for wrapping, binding and supporting belts, namely, lashing straps, bands and slings and ropes, belts and bands, not of metal, all used for handling loadsACTIVE—
037Repair services in the field of hoisting gears and cranesACTIVE—
041Training in the field of hoisting gears and cranesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 21, 2026CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 19, 2026GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Oct 19, 2026XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Oct 19, 2026GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Oct 19, 2026CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Oct 15, 2026OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 1, 2026OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Oct 1, 2026OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Sep 21, 2026TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 21, 2026CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 21, 2026ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Apr 27, 2026GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Apr 27, 2026GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 27, 2026CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 3, 2026TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 3, 2026CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 3, 2026TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 13, 2025CREVCORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - ATTORNEY REVIEW REQUIRED—
Nov 7, 2025RFNPREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 6, 2025CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 4, 2025TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 4, 2025CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 4, 2025TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 24, 2025RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
May 3, 2025CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB—
May 2, 2025RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
May 1, 2025RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Mar 19, 2025RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Mar 18, 2025CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 11, 2025DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 9, 2025MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Mar 9, 2025NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 6, 2025REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance