Drawing for OTRERA

USPTO serial 79420177

OTRERA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 653
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MESSICK, TABITHA LEE
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 104

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with OTRERA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Ronald M. Kachmarik

Ronald M. Kachmarik Cooper Legal Group LLC1388 Ridge Road, Unit 1Hinckley, OH 44233United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
011Nuclear reactors; nuclear installations in the nature of nuclear generators and nuclear sodium fast reactors; nuclear cogeneration plants; steam generators; steam generating apparatus; apparatus for heating, for steam generating, and for recycling of fuels, of nuclear materials, of uranium, of plutonium and of nuclear waste; installations for nuclear reactors, namely, nuclear vessels for sodium fast reactors, nuclear boilers for sodium fast reactors, and nuclear islands for sodium fast reactorsACTIVE—
042Engineering, namely, technical assessments concerning design; technical research in the field of nuclear generators and nuclear sodium fast reactors; computer software design; computer software development; engineering in the fields of nuclear energy; chemistry research services in the field of nuclear energy; engineering and technology professional consultations and planning in the fields of nuclear energyACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 10, 2026OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 26, 2026OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Aug 26, 2026OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Aug 21, 2026GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Aug 21, 2026GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Aug 21, 2026CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jul 20, 2026TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 20, 2026CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 20, 2026TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 7, 2026ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Mar 19, 2026RFNPREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 19, 2026GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 19, 2026GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 19, 2026CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 19, 2026LOPELETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE REVIEWED - ACTION TAKEN—
Feb 9, 2026TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 9, 2026CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 9, 2026TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 23, 2026LOPTLETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE FORWARDED—
Aug 29, 2025RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 11, 2025RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Aug 11, 2025RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jun 26, 2025RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jun 25, 2025CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 19, 2025NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jun 13, 2025DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 31, 2025MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Mar 31, 2025NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 28, 2025LIMILIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED—
Mar 27, 2025REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance