USPTO serial 79422456
GENERATIVE CAE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CERDA, VICTOR
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 123
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with GENERATIVE CAE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Recorded or downloadable computer software platforms; recorded or downloadable computer software platforms for generating design, analysis or simulation data using computer-aided technology; computer software, recorded; recorded computer software for generating design, analysis or simulation data using computer-aided technology; computer software applications, downloadable; downloadable computer software applications for generating design, analysis or simulation data using computer-aided technology; computer programs, recorded; recorded computer programs for generating design, analysis or simulation data using computer-aided technology. | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Design, creation or maintenance of computer programs; design, creation or maintenance of computer programs for generating design, analysis or simulation data using computer-aided technology; computer platform development; development of a computer platform for generating design, analysis or simulation data using computer-aided technology; computer system design; design of computer systems for generating design, analysis or simulation data using computer-aided technology; computer software design; design of computer software for generating design, analysis or simulation data using computer-aided technology; maintenance of computer software; maintenance of computer software for generating design, analysis or simulation data using computer-aided technology; providing computer programs; providing computer programs for generating design, analysis or simulation data using computer-aided technology; software as a service (SaaS); software as a service for generating design, analysis or simulation data using computer-aided technology (SaaS); computer software rental; providing computer software for generating design, analysis or simulation data using computer-aided technology; platform as a service (PaaS); platform as a service for generating design, analysis or simulation data using computer-aided technology (PaaS). | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 8, 2026 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 23, 2026 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 23, 2026 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 4, 2026 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 4, 2026 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 7, 2025 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 20, 2025 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 20, 2025 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Sep 4, 2025 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Sep 3, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 1, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 26, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Apr 26, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Apr 26, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 24, 2025 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |