USPTO serial 79422463
ALMAFLEX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 653
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CALI, KRISTIN K
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 131
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ALMAFLEX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jason L DeFrancesco
Jason L DeFrancesco DeFrancescoLaw609A Piner Rd PMB 2029Wilmington, NC 28409United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Power operated load handling machines for moving and shifting merchandise, namely power-operated forklifts for industrial material handling, overhead conveyor machines and modular hanging-part handling systems for intralogistics in manufacturing plants; machines and machine tools for the treatment of materials and manufacturing, namely, machines and machine tools for cutting, shaping, and finishing metal and plastic materials; industrial robots for transferring workpieces in the manufacturing and intralogistics automation processes | ACTIVE | — |
| 039 | Transport services, namely, industrial intralogistics transport of parts and workpieces within manufacturing plants, warehouses, and distribution facilities, including transport of hanging parts via overhead conveyor systems; transportation logistics, namely, planning, routing, sequencing, and flow management of parts and workpieces for internal plant intralogistics; storage, namely, industrial storage of parts and workpieces for manufacturing and warehouse operations, including buffering and sequencing storage integrated with overhead conveyor systems; storage and transport, namely, coordinated industrial storage and internal transport of parts and workpieces in manufacturing facilities; advisory services relating to the storage of goods namely, consulting in the design and operation of industrial intralogistics storage and sequencing systems for manufacturing and warehouse environments | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 8, 2026 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 23, 2026 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 23, 2026 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 1, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 11, 2026 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 11, 2026 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 11, 2026 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 11, 2026 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 26, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 25, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 25, 2025 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 18, 2025 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 28, 2025 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 27, 2025 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Aug 16, 2025 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Aug 15, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 14, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 28, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Apr 28, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 24, 2025 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |