USPTO serial 79423086
HOMEMADE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 654
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FEDERICO, EVAN G
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 131
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with HOMEMADE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
TIMOTHY A. DUFFY
TIMOTHY A. DUFFY Law Office of Timothy A. Duffy, P.C.725 W Orchard CirLake Forest, IL 60045United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Edible oils and fats; butter; cheese containing spices; meat-based snack foods; poultry; sausages; sausage meats; preserved mixed pickles; prepared meals consisting primarily of meat, fish, poultry or vegetables, as well as ready to serve salads; processed potatoes; mashed potatoes; fish; preserved, dried and cooked vegetables; cheese; cheese spreads | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Bread and flatbread, namely, plain paratha, whole wheat paratha, onion paratha, red cilliparatha, green chilli paratha, aloo paratha, chocolate paratha, cheese paratha; chapati, namely chapatipuri; Punjabi samosa; naan bread; flatbread, namely, sheermal; samosas containing mixed vegetables; bread; pastry; cakes; non-medicated candy confectionery; biscuits; communion dough which can be filled with a mix of vegetables, minced meat, minced chicken and minced beef; wheat flour which can be filled with a mix of vegetables, minced meat, minced chicken and minced beef; spring rolls made of dough filled with a mix of vegetables, minced meat, minced chicken and minced beef; spices; mixed spices; curry spices; marinades containing spices; spices in the form of powders; prepared meals, mainly consisting of rice or pasta; frozen meals consisting primarily of pasta or rice; foodstuffs in the form of prepared meals consisting primarily of pasta or rice; curry pastes; bakery products; mixes for bakery goods; yeast; cookies; wafers; Dessert puddings; frozen confections; frozen cakes; frozen desserts consisting of fruit and cream or cream substitutes; frozen yogurts; breakfast cereals; pasta; noodles; rice-based snack foods; flour-based snack foods; cereal-based snack foods | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 22, 2026 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jul 22, 2026 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 20, 2026 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 20, 2026 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 20, 2026 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 10, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 10, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 10, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 26, 2025 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 10, 2025 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 10, 2025 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| May 15, 2025 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| May 14, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 13, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 12, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| May 12, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 8, 2025 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |