Drawing for DOCUSTREAM

USPTO serial 79423497

DOCUSTREAM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 661
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
PATEL, SHEENA KAPOOR
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 106

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DOCUSTREAM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Caitlin R. Byczko

Caitlin R. Byczko Barnes & Thornburg LLP11 South Meridian StreetIndianapolis, IN 46204United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Image transmission apparatus; image reproduction apparatus; digital recording media in the nature of pre-recorded digital media devices featuring videos, interactive chats, podcasts, quizzes, and dynamic multimedia content; data processing equipment; computers; downloadable and recorded computer software for conversion of data and documents into videos, interactive chats, podcasts, quizzes, and dynamic multimedia contentACTIVE—
042Technological research services in the field of document management and conversion; design of computers for third parties; computer software and hardware development; computer software design; computer software development; computer software installation; computer software maintenance; updating of software; software rental; programming for computers, namely, computer programming for others; computer system analysis; computer system design; consultancy services with respect to computer hardware design and development; digitization of documents; Software as a Service (SaaS) services featuring software for conversion of data and documents into videos, interactive chats, podcasts, quizzes, and dynamic multimedia content; cloud computing featuring software for use in databases in the field of document management and conversion; advisory services relating to information technology; server hosting; electronic data storageACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 14, 2026OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Oct 14, 2026OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Sep 21, 2026TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 21, 2026CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 21, 2026TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 9, 2026RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 24, 2026RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Mar 24, 2026RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Feb 19, 2026RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Feb 18, 2026CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 24, 2026DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 23, 2026MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jan 23, 2026NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
May 28, 2025LIMILIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED—
May 15, 2025REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance