USPTO serial 79423786
MAXHUB
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 643
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BIBB, SCOTT
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 109
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MAXHUB?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert J. Keenney
Robert J. Keenney Willcox & Savage, P.C.8201 Greensboro Drive, Suite 1001Attn.: IP AdministratorMcLean, VA 22102Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Agricultural machines, namely, cultivators, harvesters, disk harrows, seeders; robotic lawnmowers; disintegrators for chemical processing; shredders for industrial use; battery-powered motors; wrapping machines; individual working robots for packaging; metalworking machines; industrial robots; industrial robots, namely, robotic arms for industrial purposes; machines for the electronics industry, namely, wrapping machines; bearings as parts of machines; belts for machines; industrial robots for welding; electric machines and apparatus for cleaning floors, rugs, carpets; electric washing machines for industrial purposes; robots for piping system cleaning; road sweeping machines, self-propelled; dust exhausting installations for cleaning purposes; filtering machines for chemical processing; vending machines; snow ploughs; vacuum cleaners for commercial use; cleaning machines for ponds; machines and apparatus for carpet shampooing, electric; sweeping machines for charging, namely, rechargeable sweepers; snow blowers; electric window cleaning machines; vacuum cleaners for industrial purposes; hand-held vacuum cleaners. | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 29, 2026 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 14, 2026 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 14, 2026 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 22, 2025 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 22, 2025 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 22, 2025 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 19, 2025 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Sep 19, 2025 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 19, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 19, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 19, 2025 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 16, 2025 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 28, 2025 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 28, 2025 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jun 5, 2025 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jun 4, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 20, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 19, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| May 19, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 15, 2025 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |