USPTO serial 79424658
THUNDER BLITZ
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 653
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MANCA, ALBERTO I
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 108
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with THUNDER BLITZ?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Clinton G. Newton
Clinton G. Newton Shook, Hardy & Bacon L.L.P.2555 Grand Blvd.Kansas City, MO 64108United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Downloadable or recorded computer programmes for use in online gaming and gambling; downloadable or recorded computer software for enabling the operation of gaming and entertainment apparatus and instruments; downloadable or recorded computer games. | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Entertainment services, namely, conducting a game of chance simultaneously at multiple, independent gaming establishments, providing online computer games, providing online games of chance and social games being computer games, conducting casino gaming contests and tournaments, gaming services in the nature of casino gaming and gambling; provision of leisure activities, namely, providing on-line computer games; rental of electronic, electrical and digital entertainment, video, music, gaming, gambling and sports apparatus and instruments; casino, gaming, gambling and lottery services, namely, casino gaming; advice, information and consultancy services relating to all of the aforesaid services. | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 7, 2026 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Apr 23, 2026 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 23, 2026 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 23, 2026 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 13, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 12, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 12, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 31, 2025 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 11, 2025 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 11, 2025 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Aug 27, 2025 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Aug 26, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 21, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 1, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jun 1, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 29, 2025 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |