USPTO serial 79424936
MAXION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 661
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- TATE-NAGHI, JACQUELINE P
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 120
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MAXION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James C. Watson
James C. Watson TraskBritt230 South 500 East, Suite 300Salt Lake City, UT 84102United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Manufacturing machines for semiconductors, plasma surface treatment machines; optical surface treatment machines and mechanical surface treatment machines for semiconductor substrates; machines for manufacturing logic chips; machines for manufacturing memory chips; machines for implanting ions in semiconductor wafers; vacuum pumps; ion implanters, namely, machines for accelerating ions into a solid target, for use in semiconductor fabrication; structural parts and components for all the aforesaid goods; doping machines for processing semiconductors; deposition machines used for manufacturing semiconductors; plasma etching machines; equipment for manufacturing semiconductors, namely, multi-station tool machines, industrial ion and electron beam accelerators with target chambers for use in semiconductor fabrication, and structural parts and components for all the aforesaid goods. | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | Downloadable documents and data regarding information in the field of semiconductor manufacturing provided via a computer network or the Internet. | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 28, 2026 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 28, 2026 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 22, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 10, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 10, 2025 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 16, 2025 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 30, 2025 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 30, 2025 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jun 8, 2025 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jun 7, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 2, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 1, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jun 1, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 29, 2025 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |