USPTO serial 79424947
BUZZ AI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 654
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CLARK, ANDREW T
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BUZZ AI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Janet W. Cho
Janet W. Cho Williams Mullen200 South 10th Street, Suite 1600c/o IP DocketingRichmond, VA 23219Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software used for running cloud computing based applications; the aforementioned goods not for computer assisted surgical and therapeutical computer applications | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Electronic data storage and rental of web servers; providing cloud storage facilities for use as a data center for others; server hosting; software as a service (SaaS) services featuring software for machine learning, cryptographic computing, three-dimensional modeling of physical objects and data analysis using artificial intelligence (ai); design and development of software, databases, web services and cloud computing infrastructure; software as a service (SaaS) provider featuring computer software development programs for creating and developing computer databases for others to be used on cloud based servers; cloud computing; providing online non downloadable software for use in large language models and artificial intelligence (AI); advisory services in the field of cloud computing networks and applications; cloud computing and web hosting services; management services for data center networks; providing cloud storage facilities for use as a data center for others; the aforementioned services not for computer assisted surgical and therapeutical computer applications | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 28, 2026 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 28, 2026 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 17, 2026 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 20, 2026 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 5, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 5, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 5, 2026 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 17, 2026 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 17, 2026 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 17, 2026 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 23, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 23, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 23, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 5, 2025 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 20, 2025 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 19, 2025 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jul 16, 2025 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jul 15, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 11, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 30, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| May 30, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 29, 2025 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |