USPTO serial 79424999
TARSHYN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HELLMAN, ELI J
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 102
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with TARSHYN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Cream (dairy products); coconut oil for food; sesame oil for food; lecithin for culinary purposes; margarine; butter; seeds, prepared; sunflower seeds, prepared; olive oil for food; extra virgin olive oil for food; linseed oil for food; corn oil for food; almond oil for food; rape oil for food; colza oil for food; palm oil for food; palm kernel oil for food; cheese; curd; cottage cheese fritters; smetana; soya bean oil for food; soya milk; soya beans, preserved, for food; soya patties; sunflower oil for food; soups; edible fats; oils for food; potato crisps; low-fat potato crisps; fruit chips; powdered eggs; eggs. | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 12, 2026 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Feb 9, 2026 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 9, 2026 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 16, 2025 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 28, 2025 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 28, 2025 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jun 6, 2025 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jun 5, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 2, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 1, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jun 1, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 30, 2025 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |