USPTO serial 79425166
COFRAC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 641Office Action
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LINDEMYER, ANKHI MUKHERJEA
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 123
What this means
The USPTO has issued an Office Action on this application. A response is typically required before the deadline, or the application can be abandoned.
Need help with COFRAC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Office Action, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Education, namely conducting seminars, conferences and workshops in the field of audit accreditation and certification; training services for companies delivering certifications in the fields of professional formation, tourism, restaurants, agriculture, food industry, health, security, environment protection, transport, metrology, pharmacy, water quality and politics; training services in the field of audit accreditation and certification; organization and conducting of training workshops in the field of audit accreditation and certification; organization and conducting of colloquiums, seminars in the field of audit accreditation and certification; organization of exhibitions for cultural or educational purposes | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Accreditation services, namely, testing, analysis and evaluation of service providers to determine conformity with established accreditation standards; developing, evaluating and testing accreditation standards for analytical and testing laboratory to the order and specification of others; developing, evaluating and testing accreditation standards for calibration laboratory to the order and specification of others; developing, evaluating and testing accreditation standards in the field of metrology to the order and specification of others; developing, evaluating and testing accreditation standards for inter-laboratory comparison organization; developing, evaluating and testing accreditation standards for reference material producers to the order and specification of others; developing accreditation standards for inspection body to the order and specification of others; developing, evaluating and testing accreditation standards for product certification bodies to the order and specification of others; developing accreditation standards for service certification bodies to the order and specification of others; developing, evaluating and testing accreditation standards for system certification bodies to the order and specification of others; developing, evaluating and testing accreditation standards for personnel certification bodies to the order and specification of others; developing, evaluating and testing accreditation standards for system certification bodies, namely quality management, environmental management, energy management, food safety management, occupational health and safety management, information security management, anti-corruption management to the order and specification of others ; developing, evaluating and testing accreditation standards for bodies certifying the technical qualifications of companies to the order and specification of others ; developing, evaluating and testing accreditation standards for company qualification bodies to the order and specification of others; developing, evaluating and testing accreditation standards for verification bodies to the order and specification of others; engineering, quality control for others, testing of materials, calibration services; technical project studies in the field of developing, evaluating and testing accreditation standards for bodies certifying the technical qualifications of companies to the order and specification of others ; technical research related to the developing, evaluating and testing accreditation standards for bodies certifying the technical qualifications of companies to the order and specification of others; engineering surveying services and research services in the fields of physics, mechanics, safety, electricity, electronics, chemistry and pharmacy; engineering surveying services and research services in bacteriology, biology, cosmetology and the food industry; quality control and product safety testing services of goods and services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 18, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 18, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 18, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 27, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 17, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 17, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 17, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 7, 2025 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 20, 2025 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 20, 2025 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Sep 4, 2025 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Sep 3, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 21, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 6, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jun 6, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 5, 2025 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |