USPTO serial 79425886
MIKAN TAI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HALMEN, KATHERINE E
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 111
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MIKAN TAI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Sea bream, not live; processed seafood products, namely, dried seafood, frozen seafood, and seasoned seafood made from sea bream as main raw material; daily dishes, namely, prepared dishes made from sea bream as main raw material; pre-cooked curry stew, stew and soup mixes made from sea bream as main raw material; dried flakes of laver for sprinkling on rice in hot water (ochazuke-nori) made from sea bream as main raw material; dried flakes of fish, meat, vegetables or seaweed (furikake) made from sea bream as main raw material. | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 18, 2026 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 18, 2026 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 12, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 22, 2025 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 31, 2025 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 31, 2025 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Sep 13, 2025 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Sep 12, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 9, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 15, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jun 15, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 12, 2025 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |