USPTO serial 79425909
WALTER GROPIUS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HARMON, RAYMOND E
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with WALTER GROPIUS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 014 | Pearl jewellery; wedding rings; jewellery stones; pearl; watch straps of leather, plastic, metal, ceramic and precious metal; watches; wall clocks; clocks; small clocks; alarm clocks; travel alarm clocks; cases for clock, namely, cases being parts of clocks; clasps for watch straps; loops for watch straps; accessories for watch straps, namely, clocks; parts for watches, namely, spring bars, crowns, pushers, bezels, watch crystals, clock cases, watch cases, barrels [clock and watch making], pendulums, watch springs, watch chains, jewellery charms, movements for clocks and watches, clock hands; watch winder; gemstones; jewellery; jewellery boxes and watch boxes; time instruments, namely, watches; all the aforesaid goods of precious metals and their alloys | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 3, 2026 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 3, 2026 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 11, 2025 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 19, 2025 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 19, 2025 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Sep 30, 2025 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Sep 29, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 23, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 16, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jun 16, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 16, 2025 | LIMI | LIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Jun 12, 2025 | SDRC | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB | — |