Drawing for MCONFIG

USPTO serial 79425972

MCONFIG

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 654
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CAHILL, CLARE GALLAGHER
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 104

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MCONFIG?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

William C. Wright

William C. Wright Epstein Drangel LLP6 East 45th Street, 7th FloorNew York, NY 10017United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Software as a service [SaaS] featuring software for submitting requests to a manufacturing team; Software as a service [SaaS] featuring software for managing custom product setup requests; Software as a service (SaaS) services featuring software for modifying custom cell culture media and chemicals, custom single use assemblies and custom downstream unit operations; Software as a service [SaaS] featuring software that delivers recommendations to optimize formulations; Software as a service [SaaS] featuring software for optimizing custom cell culture media and chemicals, custom single use assemblies and custom downstream unit operations; Software as a service [SaaS] featuring software that provides technical guidance for custom cell culture media and process chemicals; Software as a service [SaaS] featuring software that assists with media formulas, product configuration and risk evaluations; Software as a service [SaaS] featuring software that assists with configuration and prediction of manufacturing process; software as a service (SaaS) services featuring software for configuring single use assemblies and downstream unit operations, chemicals and cell culture media, and biopharma manufacturing processesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 25, 2026RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Apr 27, 2026GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Apr 27, 2026GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Apr 27, 2026CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Mar 20, 2026TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 20, 2026CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 20, 2026TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 18, 2025RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 29, 2025RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Sep 29, 2025RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Aug 13, 2025RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Aug 12, 2025CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 11, 2025DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 23, 2025MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jun 23, 2025NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jun 19, 2025REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance