USPTO serial 79426028
DIGNA.
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HICKEY, SUSAN E
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 302
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with DIGNA.?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Software; computer programmes for data processing; computer software packages; artificial intelligence software for analysis; business technology software; data and file management and database software; software for processing images, graphics, audio, video and text; software for the integration of artificial intelligence and machine learning in the field of big data; software for searching and retrieving information across a computer network; data management software; artificial intelligence software; machine learning software; machine learning software for analysis; artificial intelligence software for surveillance; artificial intelligence and machine learning software; risk detection software; content control software; database server software; intelligent gateways for software defined storage; intelligent gateways for real-time data analysis; data processing software for word processing; data processing systems. | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Software development, programming and implementation; design and development of electronic database software; development and testing of computing methods, algorithms and software; software development; software engineering services for data processing; research in the field of computer programs and software; development, updating and maintenance of software and database systems; development of software for data and multimedia content conversion from and to different protocols; software as a service [SaaS] featuring software for deep learning; rental of software for data processing; computer programming services for the analysis of data; technical data analysis services; software engineering; preparation of data processing programmes; computer programming for data processing and communication systems; design and development of data processing software; design services for data processing systems; research in the field of artificial intelligence technology; providing artificial intelligence computer programs on data networks; data duplication and conversion services, data coding services; data mining; development of systems for the processing of data; research in the field of data processing technology; IT services; engineering services relating to computers; computer design and programming services; rental of computer database software; advisory and information services relating to computer software; IT consultancy, advisory and information services; consultancy relating to computer database programs. | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 16, 2026 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 16, 2026 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 31, 2025 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 16, 2025 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 16, 2025 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Sep 2, 2025 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Sep 1, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 27, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 20, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jun 20, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 19, 2025 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |