Drawing for PLAYABILITY

USPTO serial 79426075

PLAYABILITY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 681
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
TWOHIG, SHANNON MARIE
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PLAYABILITY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Roberto Ledesma

Roberto Ledesma Law Office of Roberto LedesmaP.O. Box 230692New York, NY 10023United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
028Board games to assist in educational activities; manipulative logic games to assist in educational activities.ACTIVE—
041Educational activities, namely, providing information to teachers about development tool translating psychometric concepts into classroom concepts that can be interpreted by the teacher, and providing educational information via a user guide to board games and logic games to be used in educational activities with the purpose to help the work and teaching the children who fall within the normal range by relying on their cognitive strengths and how and with what tools to develop weaker abilities at the same time.ACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 26, 2026CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 21, 2026TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 21, 2026CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 21, 2026ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
May 5, 2026GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
May 5, 2026GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 5, 2026CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 8, 2026TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 8, 2026CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 8, 2026TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 19, 2026RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 3, 2026RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Mar 3, 2026RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Feb 4, 2026RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Feb 3, 2026CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 3, 2026DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 2, 2026MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Feb 2, 2026NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jun 19, 2025REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance