Drawing for SHELL AND TWIST

USPTO serial 79426160

SHELL AND TWIST

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 681
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
AGREDA, SAMANTHA LEIGH
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SHELL AND TWIST?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jeffrey H. Greger

Jeffrey H. Greger STUDEBAKER BRACKETT PLLC8255 Greensboro DriveSuite 300Tysons, VA 22102

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
011Apparatus for heating, steam generating, refrigerating, drying, water distribution, namely, tubular heat exchangers not being part of machines; air-conditioning apparatus and installations; freezers; air and water purifying apparatus and machines; sterilizing apparatus in the nature of sterilizers and medical autoclaves; refrigerating apparatus and installations; heat exchangers not being parts of machinesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 17, 2026CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 13, 2026TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 13, 2026CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 13, 2026ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
May 11, 2026GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
May 11, 2026GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 11, 2026CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 8, 2026TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 8, 2026CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 8, 2026TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 21, 2025NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Oct 31, 2025RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 12, 2025RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Oct 12, 2025RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Aug 27, 2025RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Aug 26, 2025CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 22, 2025DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 23, 2025MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jun 23, 2025NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jun 19, 2025REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance