USPTO serial 79426304
PEOPLE IMPACT ANALYTICS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 661
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KLEINMAN, CORINNE ANNE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 122
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PEOPLE IMPACT ANALYTICS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Collating of data in computer databases; human resources management and recruitment services; administrative data processing; business consultancy and advisory services; business analysis and information services; human resources management analyses, information services and consulting; market research; provision of market research; opinion polling; employee opinion polling; business consulting and information services relating to changes in business activity and companies; human resources management consulting and information services relating to changes in business activity and companies; employee opinion polling relating to changes in business activity and companies. | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 24, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 24, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 24, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 16, 2026 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 26, 2026 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 6, 2026 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 6, 2026 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Feb 6, 2026 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Feb 5, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 30, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 30, 2026 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jan 29, 2026 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 19, 2025 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |