USPTO serial 79426305
SNOOP PRO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 645Office Action
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- THOMAS, JULIE
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107
What this means
The USPTO has issued an Office Action on this application. A response is typically required before the deadline, or the application can be abandoned.
Need help with SNOOP PRO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Office Action, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Sean F. Mellino
Sean F. Mellino McDonald Hopkins LLC600 Superior Avenue East, Suite 2100Cleveland, OH 44114United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Measuring apparatus, namely, radio-frequency power meters and coupling elements for use in measuring the functionality, quality and performance of radio frequency identification (RFID) inlays, tags and labels and near field communication (NFC) inlays, tags and labels; testing apparatus and instruments, namely, RFID and NFC readers for testing durability, functionality, quality and performance of radio frequency identification (RFID) inlays, tags and labels and near field communication (NFC) inlays, tags and labels; testing apparatus for electronic equipment, namely, RFID and NFC readers for testing durability of radio frequency identification (RFID) inlays, tags and labels and near field communication (NFC) inlays, tags and labels; circuit testing instruments, namely, continuity test apparatus for electrical circuits; electronic testing apparatus for use in the field of telecommunications, namely, machines in the nature of RFID and NFC readers and radio-frequency power meters for testing the performance of radio frequency identification (RFID) readers and inlays, tags and labels; material testing instruments and machines, namely, electronic apparatus for testing of radio frequency identification (RFID) inlays, tags and labels by testing strength of the goods via mechanical stress tests; testing apparatus for testing printed circuit boards; electronic testing apparatus for testing high frequency (HF) and ultra high frequency (UHF) inlays, integrated circuits, radio-frequency identification (RFID) tags, chips and labels; testing apparatus for checking electronic devices, namely, electronic apparatus for testing the electrical conductivity of radio frequency identification (RFID) readers; probes for testing integrated circuits; testing and quality control devices, namely, electronic apparatus for testing the electrical conductivity of radio frequency identification (RFID) inlays, tags and labels during manufacture; radio frequency and microwave device testing and calibration equipment, namely, radio frequency identification (RFID) label and tag encoding apparatus; encoding and decoding apparatus and instruments; antennas; radio-frequency antennas; computer-controlled apparatus for testing and measuring the functionality, quality and performance of radio-frequency identification (RFID) tags, chips and labels; computer-controlled apparatus for testing and measuring the functionality, quality and performance of near field communication (NFC) tags, chips and labels; couplings, electric; coaxial cables; radio-frequency identification (RFID) readers and near field communication (NFC) technology enabled readers; radio-frequency identification (RFID) tags; labels with integrated RFID chips; radio-frequency components, namely, radio-frequency identification (RFID) coupling elements; radio frequency identification devices, namely, radio-frequency transmitters and receivers; radio-frequency power meters; shielding plates for testing apparatus and instruments, namely, signal blocking shielding plates for shielding out signals from adjacent tags and inlays to enable testing only the specific tags and inlays of interest for use in radio frequency identification (RFID) coupling elements; shielding plates for testing apparatus and instruments, namely, signal blocking shielding plates for use in radio frequency identification (RFID) coupling elements; parts for all aforementioned goods, namely, replacement parts | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 22, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 22, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 22, 2026 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 4, 2026 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Oct 4, 2026 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 4, 2026 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 15, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 15, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 15, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 1, 2026 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 17, 2025 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 16, 2025 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Oct 16, 2025 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Oct 15, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 25, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 20, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jun 20, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 19, 2025 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |