USPTO serial 79426591
Q CLOUD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 641Office Action
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CARUSO, JAMES J
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 136
What this means
The USPTO has issued an Office Action on this application. A response is typically required before the deadline, or the application can be abandoned.
Need help with Q CLOUD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Office Action, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Sean Ulrich
Sean Ulrich MGL LLP5777 W. Century Blvd. Ste 1125Los Angeles, CA 90045United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for facial recognition, task management, regulatory compliance, incident reporting and staff training for use in the hospitality industry; Platform as a service (PAAS) featuring computer software platforms for using artificial intelligence (AI) for facial recognition, task management, regulatory compliance, incident reporting and staff training for use in the provision of hospitality services; providing on-line non-downloadable software for use in enterprise resource planning; software as a service (SAAS) services and platform as a service (PAAS) featuring computer software platforms for use in business management; software as a service (SAAS) services and platform as a service (PAAS) featuring computer software platforms for accounting; software as a service (SAAS) services and platform as a service (PAAS) featuring computer software platforms for analysing market information; software as a service (SAAS) services and platform as a service (PAAS) featuring computer software platforms for hospitality industry data analysis; software as a service (SAAS) services and platform as a service (PAAS) featuring computer software platforms for gathering, processing, monitoring, analysing, managing and/or reporting financial, regulatory compliance, staff incident and staff training information; software as a service (SAAS) services and platform as a service (PAAS) featuring computer software platforms for analysing labour costs and/or creating personnel rosters; software as a service (SAAS) services and platform as a service (PAAS) featuring computer software platforms for analysing sales, profitability, financial data and/or business trading activities; software as a service (SAAS) services and platform as a service (PAAS) featuring computer software platforms for facial recognition using artificial intelligence (AI), task management, regulatory compliance, incident reporting and/or staff training; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring computer software using artificial intelligence (AI) for use in providing financial, accounting and business services; Platform as a service (PAAS) featuring computer software platforms using artificial intelligence (AI) for use in providing financial, accounting and business services of others; software as a service (SAAS) services featuring computer software using artificial intelligence (AI) for facial recognition, task management, regulatory compliance, incident reporting and staff training for use in the hospitality industry; software as a service (SAAS) services featuring computer software using artificial intelligence (AI) for facial recognition, task management, regulatory compliance, incident reporting and staff training for use in the hospitality industry for use in the provision of hospitality services of others; platform as a service (PAAS) featuring computer software platforms using artificial intelligence (AI) for facial recognition, task management, regulatory compliance, incident reporting and staff training for use in the hospitality industry; platform as a service (PAAS) featuring computer software platforms using artificial intelligence (AI) for facial recognition, task management, regulatory compliance, incident reporting and staff training for use in the hospitality industry for use in the provision of hospitality services of others. | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 25, 2026 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 28, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 28, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 28, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 6, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 6, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 6, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 30, 2025 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 7, 2025 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 7, 2025 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Sep 19, 2025 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Sep 18, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 2, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 27, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jun 27, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 26, 2025 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |